Formulas are easier to believe with numbers attached. Each scenario below was computed by
the same engine as the main calculator — change any of them there and watch
the balance move.
An early start
Start with $5,000.00, assume 7% per year
compounded monthly, add $100.00 at the end of each month, wait
40 years. The balance reaches $344,038.40 — of
which $48,000.00 was deposited along the way and
$291,038.40 (84.6% of the
total) is interest.
A small start at a young age, left alone for four decades. Time does most of the work.
A late start, bigger deposits
Start with $5,000.00, assume 7% per year
compounded monthly, add $400.00 at the end of each month, wait
20 years. The balance reaches $228,564.36 — of
which $96,000.00 was deposited along the way and
$127,564.36 (55.8% of the
total) is interest.
The same rate and start, half the time, four times the monthly deposit — and a lower finish. The two scenarios use identical assumptions; only time and deposits differ.
Cash-like caution
Start with $25,000.00, assume 2% per year
compounded monthly, add $0.00 at the end of each month, wait
15 years. The balance reaches $33,738.04 — of
which $0.00 was deposited along the way and
$8,738.04 (25.9% of the
total) is interest.
A low steady rate barely outruns its own starting line over 15 years — the clearest illustration of why the assumed rate matters.
No start, just a habit
Start with $0.00, assume 5% per year
compounded monthly, add $150.00 at the end of each month, wait
30 years. The balance reaches $124,838.80 — of
which $54,000.00 was deposited along the way and
$70,838.80 (56.7% of the
total) is interest.
Nothing to begin with. Everything in the "deposits" column was paid in month by month; everything beyond it is compounding.
All rates here are hypothetical assumptions chosen for illustration. They
are not the rates of any account or investment, real outcomes vary and can be negative,
and nothing on this page is financial advice or a recommendation to follow any scenario.
Frequently asked questions
Why does the early-start scenario beat the bigger-deposit one?
Because growth is exponential in time but only linear in deposits. Doubling the years squares the compounding effect; doubling deposits merely doubles their contribution. The deposit-heavy scenario pays in far more cash and still finishes behind.
Are these scenarios predictions?
No. They are arithmetic under fixed assumptions — a way to see the shape of compound growth. Real saving and investing involve changing rates, taxes, fees and your own behaviour.
Can I run my own numbers?
Yes — the compound interest calculator takes any combination, and the savings goal calculator solves for the deposit a target requires.